Deep Cryogenics International (720) 347-8886 Request a Quote
Home/Case study: Coeur Mining shovel teeth
Case study · Published September 9, 2025

Shovel teeth: 280–340 hours became 634.

Coeur Mining ran DCI deep-cryogenically treated shovel teeth against its standing wear baseline. Untreated teeth typically lasted 280–340 operational hours; the treated teeth averaged 634 hours — a wear-life improvement of more than 90%, measured by the mine, on its own equipment, in its own ore.

Operational hours to changeout — shovel teeth
0 350 700 280–340 h 634 h avg UNTREATED DCI-TREATED
Published by DCI, September 9, 2025. Baseline is the mine's standing figure for untreated teeth in the same service, in operational hours as the mine logs them; the >90% improvement is computed against the baseline average — against even the best untreated teeth (340 h), treated teeth ran 86% longer.
Shovel teeth and adapters strapped on pallets between the rails of a DCI chamber
DCI photo · shovel teeth loaded · marks blurred
The study at a glance
CustomerCoeur Mining (U.S.)
PartsExcavator shovel teeth
Baseline (untreated)280–340 operational hours
Treated average634 operational hours
Improvement>90% vs baseline average
Against best untreated (340 h)+86%
Who measuredThe mine, on its own equipment
Treatment−300 °F DCT, ~36 h recorded cycle

Why does this study carry weight?

Because the customer measured it. The baseline was the mine's own standing figure for untreated teeth, and the treated result came off the mine's own equipment in normal service — not a lab coupon, not a vendor demo. We didn't grade our own homework.

What was actually done to the teeth?

A proprietary DCI production cycle: controlled descent in dry nitrogen vapor, an extended soak at up to −300 °F, and an in-chamber temper — one continuous, computer-recorded run of roughly 36 hours. No coating, no dimensional change. What happens in the metal →

What does a >90% result mean operationally?

Roughly half the tooth changes for that wear position: fewer exposure hours for the crew in the pit, fewer production interruptions — and treated-part economics that clear the bar even at a fraction of this result. The published range across mining parts is 20–60%; this study is the documented best case, not the promise. The ROI math →

Can this be replicated on your parts?

That's the right question, and it's answerable with your own data: your standing baseline, treated and control teeth from the same lot in alternating positions on the same bucket, measured the way you already measure, with stop criteria agreed before anything ships. If your alloy is a poor candidate, we'll say so up front. How honest verification works →

Run this comparison at your operation

Start with your baseline numbers — quotes in two business days.

Request a quote